American petroleum institute’s recent code for offshore oil
and gas structures’ integrity management (APIRP 2SIM), came up with a concept
that damage can be tolerable. This concept is based on looking towards structure
as a system and not number of individual components (this is how a design
engineer look at it while designing new structure). This is a fundamental
change in concept of life extension of structures, previously it had to be
demonstrated that every component satisfies the design criteria resulting in
need of all damages to be repaired. Now with the concept of “damage can be
tolerable” and looking into structure as a system, it can be very well shown
that (by use of ultimate strength analysis) structure as whole (system) still
satisfies the design criteria with a minimum repairs/ no repairs.
Further, risk based techniques can be used for development
in inspection programs for damage detection and repair scheme.
Here risk is defined, as product of probability of failure
and consequence of failure, for calculations of probability of failure.
We need strong background of statistical knowledge, as a
minimum, we should be able to model the material and loads stochastically so
that we can come up with area of overlap as probability of failure. Following figure
shows a typical structural engineering problem where R is resistance (strength)
of material and S is loads effect.
A typical design engineer does not have any knowledge about,
how codes are developed or what is background theory about partial safety
factors used? So he/ she takes help of structural engineering knowledge alone that
too within framework of code requirements to save the structure. Sometimes he/she
may succeed with help of advanced structural analyses. But most of the times
the end result would be lot of repair suggestions or exhaustive inspection
plans. Spending a lot of money to save the structure for its future use.
But a smart structural engineer should have a good statistical
background and good domain knowledge so he can combine code ideas to apply for
site specific things statistically and come up with optimum repair suggestions
and risk based inspection plan.
Aalborg University has a requirement to complete PhD is that,
we should complete at least 30 credits through various PhD courses planned. With
every PhD course, I undertook I feel that I am getting my statistical knowledge
building up. So I can say following applies rightly here :P
Half of being
smart is knowing what you are dumb about.
Thanks for reading my blog, keep reading for future updates
and stay tuned on INFRASTAR on
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
No comments:
Post a Comment